The estimates of the numbers of home-schooled children vary widely. The U.S.
Department of Education estimates there are 250,000 to 350,000 home-schooled
children in the country. Home-school advocates put the number much higher-at
about a million.
Many public school advocates take a harsh attitude toward home scholars, perceiving their
actions as the ultimate slap in the face for public education and a damaging move for the children.
Home schoolers harbor few kind words for public schools, charging shortcomings that range from
lack of religious perspective in the curriculum to a herd like approach to teaching children.
Yet, as public school officials realize they stand little to gain by remaining hostile to the home-school population, and as home schoolers realize they can reap benefits from public schools, these
hard lines seem to be softening a bit. Public schools and home schoolers have moved closer to
tolerance and, in some cases, even cooperation.
Says John Marshall, an education official, “We are becoming relatively tolerant of home
schoolers.” The idea is, ‘Let’s give the kids access to public school so they’ll see it’s not so
terrible as they’ve been told, and they’ll want to come back.
Perhaps, but don’t count on it, say home-school advocates. Home schoolers oppose the
system because they have strong convictions that their approach to education-whether fueled by
religious enthusiasm or the individual child’s interests and natural pace-is best.
“The bulk of home schoolers just want to be left alone,” says Enge Cannon, associate
director of the National Center for Home Education. She says home schoolers choose that path for
a variety of reasons, but religion plays a role 85 percent of the time.
Professor Van Galen breaks home schoolers into two groups. Some home schoolers want their
children to learn not only traditional subject matter but also “strict religious doctrine and a
conservative political and social perspective. Not incidentally, they also want their children to
learn-both intellectually and emotionally-that the family is the most important institution in society.”
Other home schoolers contend “not so much that the schools teach heresy(異端邪說), but
that schools teach whatever they teach inappropriately,” Van Galen writes. “These parents are
highly independent and strive to ‘take responsibility’ for their own lives within a society that they
define as bureaucratic and inefficient.”
1. According to the passage, home schoolers are ______.
A. those who engage private teachers to provide additional education for their children
B. those who educate their children at home instead of sending them to school
C. those who advocate combining public education with home schooling
D. those who don’t go to school but are educated at home by their parents
2. Public schools are softening their position on home schooling because ______.
A. there isn’t much they can go to change the present situation
B. they want to show their tolerance for different teaching systems
C. home schooling provides a new variety of education for children
D. public schools have so many problems that they cannot offer proper education for all
children
3. Home-school advocates are of the opinion that ______.
A. things in public schools are not so bad as has often been said
B. their tolerance of public education will attract more kids to public schools
C. home schooling is superior and, therefore, they will not easily give in
D. their increased cooperation with public school will bring about the improvement of public
education
4. Most home schoolers’ opposition to public education stems from their ______.
A. respect for the interests of individuals
B. worry about the inefficiency of public schools
C. concern with the cost involved
D. devotion to religion
5. According to Van Galen some home schoolers believe that ______.
A. public schools take up a herblike approach to teaching children
B. teachers in public school are not as responsible as they should be
C. public schools cannot provide an education that is good enough for their children
D. public schools are the source of bureaucracy and inefficiency in modern society
特別聲明:①凡本網(wǎng)注明稿件來源為"原創(chuàng)"的,轉(zhuǎn)載必須注明"稿件來源:育路網(wǎng)",違者將依法追究責(zé)任;
②部分稿件來源于網(wǎng)絡(luò),如有侵權(quán),請聯(lián)系我們溝通解決。
近些年來,攻讀在職研究生已經(jīng)成為很多人提高自我的重要方法,我們都知道,非全日制研究生與全日制研究生一同考試,入學(xué)較難,因而同等學(xué)力申碩已經(jīng)成為多數(shù)人的挑眩那么,...
評論0
“無需登錄,可直接評論...”